[Ggcs-presentations] GGCS January Newsletter

[Heinz Scheuenstuhl]

Note that the 179 number also includes the libraries and one or two comps.

      From: Marcelino Nogueiro <mnogueiro at hotmail.com>
 To: B. Bloch <bcbloch at juno.com>; "ggcs-presentations at ggcs.org" <ggcs-presentations at ggcs.org>; Heinz Scheuenstuhl <heinzs at yahoo.com> 
 Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 7:23 PM
 Subject: Re: [Ggcs-presentations] GGCS January Newsletter
  
#yiv2322886861 -- P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}#yiv2322886861 73 out of 179!  Even if the industry average indicates that at 40.8% we are doing well, it's disturbing to me that only 73 members are clicking on the message!  Not to mention that doesn't actually tell us if they actually open the pdf.
Sad,Marcelino


From: Ggcs-presentations <ggcs-presentations-bounces at ggcs.org> on behalf of Heinz Scheuenstuhl <heinzs at yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 7:10 PM
To: B. Bloch; ggcs-presentations at ggcs.org
Subject: Re: [Ggcs-presentations] GGCS January Newsletter Ok. I checked the stats for Mailchimp and apparently 73 of 179 have opened the email (40.8%) compared to a non-profit industry average of 20.9%. There are, so far, 37 clicks (24.8%) compared to an average 2.3%, so we're well above industry average on both counts.
Adding the newsletter as an attachment increases the bandwidth of the email and the chance that it is going to be considered spam. We already have issues with people's spam filters keeping my Yahoo mail, etc. from their inboxes. Chris, you need to put me in your recipients list as the last three emails from me were bounced.
Heinz

From: B. Bloch <bcbloch at juno.com>
To: heinzs at yahoo.com; ggcs-presentations at ggcs.org
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Ggcs-presentations] GGCS January Newsletter

That's really concerning, if people aren't going to link and getting the NL. Do we have any way of telling how many people got to the web site and then to the NL there to view or DL it? Perhaps we should ask people at the next few GM's whether and how they get the NL and try to see what's going on.  I realize that people may not have been reading the hard copy NL, but I know I have a tendency put off going to a link for a document and might never get around to it, whereas if it's an attachment, I get it right away. Meanwhile, at Steering could we discuss possibility of Emailing the NL as an attachment so people actually get it without having to go to link and DL it?  When we mailed hard copy NL we at least knew it got there.  

---------- Original Message ----------
From: Heinz Scheuenstuhl <heinzs at yahoo.com>
To: Marcelino Nogueiro <mnogueiro at hotmail.com>,  Chris Santilli <chris at wordcrafting.com>,  Heinz Scheuenstuhl <hscheuenstuhl at gmail.com>,  Steve Shank <steve at shank.net>
Cc: GGCS Presentations Committee Presentations <ggcs-presentations at ggcs.org>
Subject: Re: [Ggcs-presentations] GGCS January Newsletter
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 23:25:57 +0000 (UTC)

We advertise 4th Monday everywhere, including the website (as soon as I get it set up). My ratio of clicks per mailing of the newsletter link are extremely low. In addition, I will correct the text in the published newsletter. Heinz


| 
|   |
|   |
| 
| 
|   |


| 
| 
|   |

 |


|   |


| 
|   |

 |

 |

 |

 |
| 
| 
| 
|   |

 |

 |


|   |


| 
|   |

 |

 |

 |







   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ggcs.org/pipermail/ggcs-presentations_ggcs.org/attachments/20180112/20492275/attachment-0003.html>